$300+ Million in Bus Improvements Held Hostage in Albany

One of the most destructive pieces of misinformation currently floating around the New York State Assembly is this oft-repeated line from Richard Brodsky’s newly released report:

The City has no plan to improve mass transit prior to the
implementation of congestion pricing. This is a serious if not fatal
defect in the proposal in the opinion of both supporters and opponents
of congestion pricing.

This is incorrect. The City does have plans to make significant mass transit improvements prior to the launch of congestion pricing. These plans have the potential to vastly improve the bus riding experience in New York City.

Here, for you to download, is the budget that New York City submitted as a part of its $500 million grant application to the United States Dept. of Transportation. As you can see, the City has requested $306 million for buses and bus-related infrastructure improvements. The budget also shows an additional, estimated $62 million or so coming in from state and local sources.

This new funding will be used to launch New York City’s Bus Rapid Transit program. It will be used to roll out 400 new buses on the streets of New York — more new buses than London got rolling prior to the start of congestion pricing in that city. The funding will also go towards automated bus lane enforcement, bus signal priority, pedestrian improvements around bus stops and new bus lanes on the East River Bridges.

In short, this funding will go towards revolutionizing New York City’s bus system and making New York City’s streets vastly more efficient for transportation.

It will be difficult, if not impossible, for New York City to make bus improvements as quickly or extensively without the funding and traffic reductions generated by congestion pricing.

State legislators: Wake up.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Details of Proposed Bus Service Expansion

|
The other day I noted that one of the most destructive pieces of misinformation floating around the New York State Assembly is this line from Assembly Member Richard Brodsky’s congestion pricing report: The City has no plan to improve mass transit prior to the implementation of congestion pricing. This is a serious if not fatal […]

Brodsky Represents NYC’s Wealthiest Car Commuters

|
Here is a complete copy of Assembly Member Richard Brodsky’s "Interim Report and Inquiry" into New York City’s long-term planning and congestion pricing proposals. Brodsky, you may recall, is the powerful state lawmaker with the moneybag full of parking industry contributions. Brodsky’s 20-page report concludes: The Mayor deserves great credit for thinking seriously about the […]

Don’t Underestimate the Street Safety Benefits of Congestion Pricing

|
The primary benefits of the Move NY toll reform plan are reducing congestion and funding transit — but don’t overlook the huge potential to improve street safety. Recent research at Lancaster University in the UK suggests that since the introduction of the London congestion charge in 2003, lethal crashes have fallen faster than traffic congestion. The safety gains have even […]

Paterson Backs Pricing, Introduces Bill in Albany

|
David Paterson is going to do right by his old State Senate district after all. New York’s new governor settled any doubts about his position on congestion pricing this afternoon, introducing a bill that follows the recommendations of the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission. The Daily Politics has the scoop: "Congestion pricing addresses two urgent concerns […]

TSTC Asks the Obvious, Yet Elusive, Pricing Poll Question

|
While the results of the latest Quinnipiac congestion pricing poll were repeated with little analysis earlier this week, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign noted a significant, though not surprising, shortcoming. The Quinnipiac poll failed to link congestion pricing to the mass transit improvements it would bring. The pollsters asked this question: “The Bloomberg administration has suggested […]