Will the Critics Kill Congestion Pricing?

weiner.jpg
Representative Anthony Weiner,  New York’s 9th Congressional District

In his latest article for the Gotham Gazette, Bruce Schaller, head of Schaller Consulting, and author of  "CITYinFLUX: Understanding and Untangling Traffic and Transportation in NYC" writes that the the most biting criticism of congestion pricing, mostly coming from representatives of areas outside of Manhattan, is the claim that a fee is an unfair tax on the working person:

U.S. Representative Anthony Weiner, who plans to run for mayor in 2009,
charged that the proposal "creates class conflict" and constitutes a
"regressive tax on working middle-class families and small-business
owners."

Yet the fact is that outer borough auto
commuters tend to have higher incomes than subway commuters, so a fee
that improves transit is actually more equitable than the current
system. In fact, auto commuters who use the free bridges are being
subsidized by transit users whose taxes pay for bridge reconstruction
and maintenance. Is that equitable?

Schaller goes on to challenge the skeptics:

Opponents will have to respond to the public’s increasing focus
on environmental aspects of this issue. The mayor pointed out that
childhood asthma rates are four times higher in the city than
nationally. How unfair are steps to reduce vehicle emissions that carry
these severe health effects? Given the public’s desire to see something done about traffic
congestion, opponents will also have to convince people suggest that they have a better idea.

Councilmember Weprin called for "simple traffic mitigation
alternatives to reduce congestion," but the city has made major avenues
one-way, timed signals to maximize traffic flow, restricted turns and
taken numerous other auto-friendly steps. Will the public buy the idea
that a few more tweaks will significantly reduce congestion, especially
in light of the anticipated city’s growth?

Congestion pricing clearly faces an uphill climb. But the more
New Yorkers understand the benefits of the mayor’s entire plan, the
more support congestion pricing is likely to increase.

Photo: smoothdude/Flickr

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Schaller: Road Pricing Won’t Fly Without Driver Support

|
Road pricing won’t ease this BQE traffic jam unless drivers want it to, says Bruce Schaller. Image: photoAtlas via Flickr. Road pricing isn’t going to happen unless drivers want it to, writes Bruce Schaller, one of the architects of New York’s congestion pricing push. That’s the central conclusion of a new paper Schaller penned for […]

Push for Congestion Pricing Spurs Parking Reform

|
  It may not have been Mayor Bloomberg’s intention when he proposed congestion pricing, but he has put reforming curbside parking policies front and center. Desperate for "alternatives" to pricing, opponents have borrowed proposals to hike curbside parking rates, and price free curb spaces. These parking reforms which would significantly reduce double-parking and traffic snarling […]

Rebutting Congestion Pricing’s Opponents

|
In today’s Gotham Gazette, Bruce Schaller, Visiting Scholar at the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management at New York University, assembles a nice summary of the current state of the congestion pricing debate in New York City. He writes: Opponents believe that they have the upper hand in this debate. Indeed, there is evidence for this […]

Bruce Schaller Profiles a “City in Flux”

|
Ahead of Sunday’s big PlaNYC 2030 reveal, Bruce Schaller of Schaller Consulting has released an exhaustive analysis of New York City traffic, transit and public space. "CITYinFLUX: Understanding and Untangling Traffic and Transportation in NYC" is a compendium of over 40 reports and databases, highlighting a wealth of interesting facts, charts and analyses. The complete […]