Opinion: NY Post’s Michael Goodwin Is Wrong on Congestion Pricing

Michael Goodwin believes that a GoFundMe campaign is a winning strategy to build President Trump’s border wall, asking “Where do I send my check?” in a New York Post column last month.

So when he calls congestion pricing a “scam” in his latest piece on Wednesday, it’s best to ignore his astute analysis. Goodwin wouldn’t know a scam if it walked up and hit him in the face.

In reality, under a congestion pricing plan, drivers will pay their fair share — a small fee, similar to a MetroCard swipe, collected via EZ-Pass readers — when they drive into central Manhattan, the most transit-rich area of the country. In exchange, they’ll get where they need to go faster (with easier parking when they get there, to boot), and the subway will get billions of dollars for critical improvements. Congestion pricing prioritizes the fundamental needs of a vast majority New Yorkers — regular New Yorkers, particularly lower-income workers, outer-borough residents, and seniors, who rely on public transit.

It’s no wonder a majority of the state and city wants to see Albany pass congestion pricing this year.

The MTA is in desperate need of reform, no one is denying that. And after passing congestion pricing, Albany should seriously take up MTA reform. But the transit system has reached crisis stage: cuts to basic upkeep have crippled the subway and bus networks, delays on the subway have tripled over the last five years, subway stations are literally crumbling, and aging trains and signal systems can’t keep up with massive ridership. Meanwhile, streets across the five boroughs are increasingly clogged with traffic, which results in buses moving at walking speeds, delayed deliveries, and increased danger to pedestrians and bicyclists. Every year New York delays addressing this crisis because of bureaucratic squabbling only increases its ultimate human and economic costs.

Anecdotal observations and baseless fear-mongering by people like Goodwin aside, elected officials across all levels of government have a bipartisan mandate to fix the subway now. The state must codify congestion pricing this year, and return New York to its rightful place as a worldwide leader in transit, sustainability, and safety.

Jack Davies is the campaign manager at Transportation Alternatives.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Rebutting Congestion Pricing’s Opponents

|
In today’s Gotham Gazette, Bruce Schaller, Visiting Scholar at the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management at New York University, assembles a nice summary of the current state of the congestion pricing debate in New York City. He writes: Opponents believe that they have the upper hand in this debate. Indeed, there is evidence for this […]

Submit a Congestion Pricing Question to Dr. Horodniceanu

|
The New York Times Empire Zone is hosting an interactive Q&A this afternoon with Dr. Michael Horodniceanu, a name that Streetsblog readers will recognize from our post-Iris Weinshall DOT commissioner search process rumor-mongering. Help the Times collect some good, smart questions. Here is what they’re doing: We have arranged for Michael Horodniceanu, one of the […]

Roberts: MTA Needs Congestion Pricing

|
When NYC Transit President Howard Roberts announced Monday — to some ridicule — that certain subway lines are overcrowded with little to no relief in sight, it was reported that the system would not be able to handle the influx of commuters who are expected to switch to transit should congestion pricing be implemented. Considering […]

Will Congestion Pricing Make or Break Mayoral Campaigns?

|
While we wait to see what happens, or doesn’t happen, today in Albany, New York Magazine takes a look at four mayoral aspirants and how their positions on congestion pricing may affect their chances of succeeding Michael Bloomberg. City Council Member Tony Avella: "[Avella is] an obscure pol, and attacking CP allowed him to grab […]