Bloomberg Upbeat, Media Less So, Ahead of PlaNYC Hearings

excelsior.jpgWith a scant few weeks left in the session, the state Assembly has scheduled the first of six hearings on PlaNYC — including, of course, congestion pricing — for Friday at 10 a.m. in the auditorium of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, at 42 West 44th Street.

The Daily Politics reports:

The hearing will be conducted by the Assembly Ways and Means Committee,
chaired by Herman “Denny” Farrell, Jr.; the Transportation Committee,
chaired by David Gantt; the Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
Committee, chaired by Richard Brodsky; the Energy Committee, chaired by
Paul Tonko; the Environmental Conservation Committee, chaired by Robert
Sweeney; and the Cities Committee, chaired by James Brennan.

But is it too little, too late? Though Mayor Bloomberg has refused to criticize state lawmakers for premature criticism of congestion pricing, the Daily News, for one, has not held back:

No bills have been introduced, no hearings held. Gov. Spitzer didn’t
mention the topic when he met with legislative leaders last week, until
Senate GOP leader Joe Bruno chided him for the oversight.

At this rate, the waters of melting glaciers will be lapping at the
Empire State Building doors before Mayor Bloomberg’s proposal gets out
of committee. When it comes to gridlock, the Manhattan streets have
nothing on the Capitol corridors.

The editorial board at the Times has expressed similar sentiments (though you’ll need a subscription to read them at this point). And the News blog’s Elizabeth Benjamin wonders if the hearings are a sign of progress at all.

I asked [Press Secretary] Stu Loeser whether Mayor Bloomberg plans to participate in
the Assembly Democrats’ first hearing on congestion pricing in
Manhattan this Friday, and also if he considers the event a positive
development or a stalling tactic.

Bloomberg is "looking forward" to testifying, Loeser replied,
adding: "It’s very encouraging that the Speaker has made it a priority
in the last month of session to find time to discuss the merits of
PlaNYC."

So what are Assembly members — the ones who haven’t already endorsed PlaNYC — concerned about? Pricing opponent Richard Brodsky (D-Westchester) told Benjamin that Bloomberg can expect questions regarding "the consequences of installing hundreds more cameras throughout
Manhattan
to determine who needs to be charged for entering the
congestion pricing zone and the idea of charging for access to public
roads based on an individual’s ability to pay
."

Photo: stgermh/Flickr

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

From a Sea of Green, Bloomberg Works a Tough Room

|
Flanked by dozens, if not hundreds, of citizen spectators in bright green "I Breathe and I Vote" t-shirts, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and city staffers this morning made the case for a three-year congestion pricing pilot program to a largely hostile cadre of state Assembly members. Seated alongside ten colleagues in the auditorium of the New […]

PlaNYC Testimony Live on NY1 Right Now

|
Mayor Bloomberg is presenting his plan for a greater greener New York at the first in a series of Assembly hearings today, where he is pitching his congestion pricing plan, among other aspects of his proposal for a sustainable city. DOT Deputy Commissioner Bruce Schaller got a nice introduction at the start. Watch it live […]

Charting a Course for Pricing Through City Council

|
Crain’s Insider has the most detailed look yet at the odds that the City Council will pass a congestion pricing bill [PDF]. The good news is that pricing stands a decent chance of getting through committee, thanks in part to some maneuvering by Speaker Christine Quinn. As things progress, expect to hear more about uncommitted […]

112,000 Less Cars

|
Here are more points from Friday’s PlaNYC Hearing:  Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff estimated congestion pricing would remove 112,000 cars from city streets on a daily basis, with 94,000 would-be drivers switching to transit, in what he said would be "Probably the single greatest mode shift anywhere." DOT Deputy Commissioner Bruce Schaller said that whatever edge […]

Fact Check: Congestion Pricing is Not a “Regressive Tax”

|
One of the most oft-repeated slams against congestion pricing we heard at this week’s Congestion Mitigation Committee hearings is that congestion pricing would be a "regressive tax," an unfair burden to poorer New Yorkers. Is congestion pricing regressive? The data suggests otherwise. As the chart above shows, even in Brooklyn Council member Lew Fidler’s heavily […]

Congestion Pricing Bill, Take 3.

|
Liz Benjamin has the latest scoop on congestion pricing legislation in Albany: The third version of a bill dealing with congestion mitigation in the city was introduced yesterday in both houses of the state Legislature. The Assembly and Senate are scheduled to return to Albany Thursday to take up this new bill – and nothing […]